This dropped though my letterbox this morning. It has a range of material themed around the issues of error including twelve pages, mostly of pictures, of some of my instruments in action.
For more details, look here
This dropped though my letterbox this morning. It has a range of material themed around the issues of error including twelve pages, mostly of pictures, of some of my instruments in action.
For more details, look here
As you might have gathered from the recent posts, I have been going through images of the drawing instruments for an upcoming publication. So I have been posting some of the images I have dug out – not sure all of them are posted here for the first time I have posted similar ones to these (from the same session) before but don’t think the exact ones.
I posted this experimental peep show before, but here are three of the set-up polaroids from a model that partly resonated with the spatial arrangement of the peep show image planes and partly diverged. I was looking at our tolerance to anamorphic distortions so that moving around the peep show (which included views into the exhibition space) there was not as pronounced sweet spot of resolution as is normal in the genre. The model was a test vehicle for the project and was built after the frame for the peep show.
I have posted these two related drawings before, but I have been thinking about them recently while trying to clarify my research practice. They were made twenty years ago and in making them I knew what I was discussing but could not discuss it. Through the subsequent work I can now articulate what they are about, and understand the importance of making work like this in the broader frame of things. There is a set of drawings that forms and antecedent to these, but if I look at what I am doing now it stems from these two drawings.